![]() It is true that children cannot survive unless loved and cared for by their mothers and parents, but they are cared for mostly for, as Edward Wilson and Richard Dawkins, in their social biology pointed out, the survival of the selfish genes of the parents parents see themselves surviving death through their children. In human sexual act men ejaculate thousands of spermatozoa into the female vagina and those compete and only one or a few get to the ovum to fertilize it thus, there is competition in nature. Is it true that human beings were originally cooperative before Charles Darwin’s teaching on competition as the basis of evolution (Herbert Spencer, in his Ethics, added the notion that the strong survive and the weak die out) corrupted them? Is he correct? I went to bed around 3 AM and woke up at 6 AM and had the below thoughts on his teaching. ![]() He established a movement called the world transformation movement to teach his biology-based view that we can return to cooperation before we destroy ourselves with our insane competition. In the interview he went into details explaining the nature of the human nervous system and thinking. To him we can use biology to demonstrate that at root people are cooperative and not merely competitive. ![]() He authored a book on human nature called Freedom. Last night, I watched an interview of an Australian biologist and psychiatrist, Dr. ARE HUMAN BEINGS NATURALLY COOPERATIVE OR COMPETITIVE?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |